RADIATION AND PROPAGATION

Antenna Signal Gain The effective signal gain, or power gain, of an antenna is the ratio between the power required in the antenna and the power required in an isotropic radiator to achieve the same field strength in the favored direction of the antenna under measurement (Figure 15). Direc- tive gain may be expressed as the power ratio, in units called decibels (dB). Referring to the illustration, the power gain of the antenna under test, placed at the center of the sphere, illuminates only a portion of the sphere and the power gain is the ratio of the surface area illuminated by the isotropic antenna to that area illuminated by the test antenna. Since the field pattern of radiation of any antenna is not clear, but blends into nothingness at the extremities, the practical pattern is defined as that illuminated portion of the sphere which lies between the "half-power" angles of the radiator field. On the usual polar plot of an antenna pattern, these points are the "-3 dB" power points.

DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA

® · RAD IATION FROM ANTENNA 1 ® · RAD IAT ION FROM ANTENNA 2

Figure 13. Radiation Pattern from Two Antennas Wave interference patterns created by two adjacent an- tennas. Radio waves from two adjacent sources of the same frequency reinforce or cancel each other to pro- vide wave pattern in space adjoining the antennas. In this representation the waves reinforce each other along radial lines OA, OB, 00', OC, and OD. Midway between these lines the waves cancel each other. This pattern represents an antenna array having five lobes.

Figure 14. Antenna Pattern of Directional Array
Polar plot shows antenna radiation as compared to an omnidiredional antenna. Signal gain varies with the number and adjustment of antenna elements in the ar- ray. The diredive pattern is termed the "main lobe" of the antenna, with the unwanted lobe termed the "rear lobe." The ratio between the two lobes is called the "front-to-back ratio" of the array.

cqually well in all directions) is known as an isotropic rodiator, and only exists as a mathematical concept. Such an antenna, if placed at the center of a sphere, would "illuminate" the inner surface of the sphere uni- formly.

Figure 15. Antenna Power Gain Over Isotropic Radiator

The effedive power gain of an antenna is the ratio of power required in the antenna and the power required in an isotropic radiator to achieve the same field strength in the favored diredion of the antenna under measurement. The power gain of a half-wave dipole over an isotropic radiator is 1.64. The gain of a direc- tional antenna over an isotropic radiator is expressed by the formula in the illustration.

The power gain over an isotropic radiator, or over a simple dipole, is the measuring stick for antenna per- formance. The power gain over a dipole may be com- puted from the formula shown in the illustration, which provides a quick method of determining the power gain of an antenna by measuring the radiation pattern at the -3 dB power points. Closely allied to the concept of power gain is the problem of suppressing unwanted radiation from the sides and rear of a directive antenna system. Unwanted energy radiated to the rear of the directional antenna may be compared to the energy radiated from the front of the array and is expressed as a power ratio in deci- bels termed the front-to-back ratio. Simple antennas often have a symmetrical radiation pattern and may even possess modest gain without hav- ing appreciable front-to-back ratio. More complex an- tenna arrays exhibit higher gain and front-to-back ratio, but seldom will maximum power gain and maxi- 20-9

RADIATION AND PROPAGATION

mum front-to-back ratio occur at the same condition of antenna adjustment. Power gain implies horizontal or vertical directivity in the antenna pattern which can be best expressed as a directive pattern which is a graph showing the relative radiated field intensity expressed in terms of the azi- muth angle for horizontal directivity and in terms of the elevation angle for vertical directivity (Figure 16).

B

50o 60o 70o 80o 90o 80o 70 6( 5rW

Figure 16. Directivity Patterns for Dipole Antenna One-Half Wavelength Above Perfect Ground Plane Plotted field intensity for dipole antenna. Azimuth angle for horizontal directivity is shown in (A). Vertical angle (elevation angle) is shown at (B).

Antenna Bandwidth The bandwidth of an antenna is a measure of its ability to operate over a specified range of frequencies. Unlike other antenna properties, bandwidth does not have a unique definition, as it depends on the operational re- quirement of the antenna. Bandwidth may be limited by loss in gain, change of antenna pattern, excessive SWR on the feed system, or change in input impe- dance. One of these factors, such as gain or impedance, usually limits the low-frequency limit of operation, whereas change of pattern shape might determine the

high-frequency limit. In amateur practice, bandwidth is usually specified in terms of a maximum SWR limit on the transmission line feeding the antenna system.

Mutual Impedance A conductor placed in the field of an antenna will have a current induced in it by virtue of the voltage applied to the antenna. In the case of two adjacent antennas, if a voltage is applied to the terminals of the first antenna and the induced current measured at the terminals of the second antenna, then an equal current will be found at the terminals of the first antenna if the original volt- age is applied to the terminals of the second antenna. This classic theory can be expanded into the concept of mutual impedance between two coupled antennas and accounts for the fact that the feed impedance of an individual element in an array of antennas may differ considerably from its free-space impedance because of the effect of mutual coupling with the other elements of the array. In an antenna array where the current distri- bution in the elements is critical because of pattern requirements, it is necessary to adjust the coupling sys- tem between the elements to provide correct current distribution and to match the input impedance of the array, rather than the self-impedance of the input element. The input impedance is the sum of the self-impe- dance of the fed element and the mutual impedance with all other elements in the array. The magnitude and phase of the mutual impedance depend on the ampli- tude of the current induced in the fed antenna by the other elements and this, in turn, is a function of the spacing and tuning of the additional elements. Induced currents in the fed element are greatest when the ele- ments of the array are close together, resonant, and parallel. The induced current may be in phase, or out of phase, with the fed-element current and the impedance of the array may be higher, or lower, than that of the fed element. In addition, the elements may introduce reactance into the fed element, detuning it from a reso- nant condition. All of these effects are interlocking, and changes in spacing or tuning can create vast differ- encesin the performance of an antenna array. The mutual impedance between antennas of an array is important as this factor determines the current that flows in the system for a given amount of power. The current determines the power in a given array and if the mutual impedance between the elements of an array is such that the resulting currents are greater (for the same amount of power) than if the antenna elements were not coupled, then the power gain of the system is greater.

The Antenna Above a Ground Plane

The properties of an antenna placed near a large con- ducting ground plane will be modified by the effect of ground reflection. In the hf region, the ground is a basic part of the antenna system and affects both the

radiation pattern of the antenna as well as its radiation raistance. To estimate the effects of the ground plane, an image antenna is introduced below the ground plane as shown in Figure 17. The electric charges of the master antenna above the ground are reversed in the imaginary ground image antenna. In addition, the ver- tical components of the image are in the same direction as those in the master antenna, while the horizontal components are reversed in direction. The radiated feld of the master antenna above the ground plane can be determined by replacing the ground plane with the image antenna and computing the resulting field of the two antennas. In a similar manner, the effect of the ground on the radiation resistance of the antenna can be determined by image theory.

Figure 17. Ground Plane Provides Mirror- Image Antenna

The effects of a nearby conducting ground may be esti- mated by laws of optical refledion from a mirror. An image antenna is introduced below the ground plane at the same distance from it that the master antenna is above the plane. At a distant point the field strength of the antenna is the resultant of two rays, one dirert from the antenna and the other reflected from the ground.

(Of interest is the case where one end of the master antenna terminates on the ground. For the case of the Marconi antenna (Figure 18), the input impedance of the antenna is one-half of the value of the antenna plus its image when driven in free space. The impedance of a quarter-wave Marconi, then, is one-half that of a half- wave dipole in space, or about 36.5 ohms.) A reftected ray is assumed to radiate from the image antenna and is combined with the direct ray, the resul- tant ray depending upon the orientation of the antenna with respect to the earth. The reflected, or image, ray travels a longer distance to a given point than does the direct ray and this difference in path length results in a distant field pattern that is dependent on the height of the antenna above the ground and the characteristics of the ground. At some vertical angles above the horizon the direct and reflected rays may be in phase, additive, and at other angles the rays may be out of phase with the resultant field being the difference between the two. In summary, then, the effect of the reflecting ground plane is different for horizontal and vertical antennas because of the reversal of electric charges in the image antenna. Vertically polarized waves are reflected with

Figure 18. Marconi Antenna and Ground Image The missing half of the dipole antenna is supplied by the ground image for the case of the Marconi antenna. Antenna feedpoint impedance is one-half that of dipole, or about 36.5 ohms.

no change in phase and horizontally polarized waves have their phase shifted 180 degrees on reflection. These effects produce profound differences in the field pattern of the antenna, as will be discussed in a subse- quent chapter.

The "Perfed" Antenna A simple antenna capable of covering an immense fre- quency span and having a smooth electrical transition between guided and free waves is shown in Figure 19. A coaxial transmission line gradually diverges in such a way as to hold constant the natural line dimension ra- tios, expressed as an impedance (illustration A). If the divergence is smooth, gradual, and small in terms of wavelength, relatively little reflection will exist at any point along the diverging system. A guided wave travel- ing along the expanding line will expand smoothly over a larger and larger area, and when reaching the end of the line, will simply proceed into free space with little, if any, reflection. This simple antenna is relatively in- sensitive to the frequency of the emitted wave, provided the antenna is large in relation to wavelength. A more practical and less bulky broadband antenna which holds true to the concept of gradual, smooth dimensional change per wavelength, is shown in illus- tration B. If the structure modification is more severe introducing a sudden change in system cross-section, additional sources of reflection are introduced and the bandwidth of the antenna is reduced accordingly (illus- trations C and D).

HOME
NEXT PAGE